Standard King Non-Standard Processing: Design Change and Delivery Cycle Management
In the fast-paced world of manufacturing, being able to handle non-standard processing efficiently is critical. Standard King, a leading manufacturer, took on the challenge of seamlessly incorporating design changes into their delivery cycle. This process involves design iterations, material optimization, and logistical coordination. By implementing a robust management system, Standard King achieved significant improvements in delivery time and quality control. This article will delve into the steps and strategies employed by the company to manage non-standard processing effectively.
Challenges in Non-Standard Processing
Non-standard processing presents several challenges for manufacturers. Firstly, design changes can occur frequently, leading to increased complexity and potential delays in the delivery cycle. Secondly, material sourcing may become a bottleneck, especially for unique or specialized materials. Thirdly, logistical coordination becomes more intricate as different stages of the production process must be managed efficiently. To tackle these issues, Standard King adopted a structured approach to design change management and delivery cycle optimization.
Design Change Management
Design changes are inevitable in any manufacturing process. The ability to adapt quickly and efficiently can make the difference between competitiveness and obsolescence. Standard King implemented a systematic design change management process:
Step 1: Change Request and Evaluation

When a design change is proposed, an evaluation is conducted to assess the impact on quality, cost, and delivery time. The team at Standard King evaluates the request through a series of meetings and consultations.
Step 2: Alternative Design Exploration
After evaluation, alternative designs are explored to determine the best course of action. This involves brainstorming sessions and prototyping to test different solutions.
Step 3: Formal Approval
The proposed changes are formally approved by senior management. A detailed document outlining the changes, their justification, and the expected impact is reviewed and signed off.
Step 4: Implementation and Testing
With approval in hand, the changes are implemented. Rigorous testing is conducted to ensure that the new design meets all quality and functionality requirements. Any issues identified during testing are addressed in a timely manner.

Step 5: Documentation and Training
All changes are meticulously documented, and relevant staff are trained on the new processes. This ensures that the changes are effectively communicated across the organization.
Delivery Cycle Optimization
Optimizing the delivery cycle is crucial for maintaining product quality and meeting customer expectations. Standard King focused on several key areas to streamline their delivery process:
Streamlining Material Sourcing
Standard King worked closely with suppliers to ensure a reliable and consistent supply of materials. They introduced a just-in-time (JIT) inventory system to minimize stock levels and reduce the risk of material shortages.
Enhancing Production Efficiency

To improve production efficiency, the company implemented lean manufacturing principles. This involved identifying and removing waste from the production process, such as over-processing and unnecessary handling.
Logistics Coordination
Effective logistics coordination is essential for on-time delivery. Standard King introduced real-time tracking systems to monitor the status of deliveries and ensure that they meet the agreed-upon schedules.
Quality Control
To maintain high-quality standards, Standard King strengthened their quality control processes. Regular audits and inspections were conducted at various stages of the production cycle to identify and address any issues early.
Case Study: A Smooth Transition
A case in point is the recent redesign of the company’s flagship product. The original design required a specialized material that was difficult to source. The design team proposed a revised design using a more readily available material. After thorough evaluation and testing, the changes were implemented, and the product was successfully delivered on time. This case highlights the importance of effective design change management and delivery cycle optimization.
Conclusion
By managing design changes and delivery cycles effectively, Standard King has achieved significant improvements in production efficiency and product quality. By following a structured approach and leveraging lean manufacturing principles, the company has become more agile and competitive. Manufacturers facing similar challenges can learn from Standard King’s experience and adapt their processes to improve their own performance.
Through meticulous planning, collaboration, and continuous improvement, Standard King has demonstrated that it is possible to handle non-standard processing and maintain high-quality standards. As the industry continues to evolve, the ability to adapt and optimize processes will remain crucial for success.